PI
Portillo's Inc. (PTLO)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 2025 revenue was $188.5M (+3.6% y/y) with same-restaurant sales +0.7%; diluted EPS was $0.12 and Adjusted EBITDA was $30.1M, while Restaurant-Level Adjusted EBITDA margin compressed 90 bps y/y to 23.6% .
- Versus S&P Global consensus, revenue missed ($195.8M est.) and Primary EPS was modestly ahead ($0.115 est.), while EBITDA trailed; management cut FY25 revenue growth guidance from 10–12% to 5–7% and lowered Adjusted EBITDA growth to flat–low single digits . Values retrieved from S&P Global*.
- Sequentially, transactions improved 170 bps vs Q1 but remained negative; commodity inflation moderated to +1.9% in Q2 (vs +3.4% in Q1), with beef pressure expected to intensify in H2; Texas new unit ramps and a delayed Stafford opening drove the revenue guidance cut .
- Strategic catalysts: aggressive field marketing and loyalty (Portillo’s Perks ~1.9M members), kiosk adoption (>33% in-restaurant usage), AI-enabled drive-thru rollout, and materially lower build costs ($5.2–$5.5M “RoTF 1.0” vs ~$6.8M for class of ‘24) .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Restaurant-level execution supported margins: Restaurant-Level Adjusted EBITDA was $44.5M (23.6% margin) and Adjusted EBITDA was $30.1M (+0.7% y/y) despite traffic headwinds .
- Loyalty, tech, and marketing engagement: Perks topped ~1.9M members, kiosk usage exceeded 33% with average check/mix benefits, and AI-powered drive-thru tests shaved minutes off times; “These four initiatives are building a stronger foundation for transaction growth” .
- Build-cost reduction: New “RoTF 1.0” prototypes tracked at $5.2–$5.5M per unit, over $1M lower than class of ‘24; inline formats and future “2.0” kitchens target further capital and OpEx savings with attractive cash-on-cash returns .
What Went Wrong
- Revenue miss and guidance cut: Q2 revenue missed consensus; FY25 revenue growth lowered to 5–7% and Adjusted EBITDA growth to flat–low single digits, driven by slower Texas ramps and Stafford permitting delays .
- Margin compression: Restaurant-level margin fell 90 bps y/y to 23.6% on higher other operating expenses (+60 bps) and modest commodity/labor inflation, partially offset by pricing/mix .
- Mix pressure from trade-down: Despite kiosk-driven attachment, guests traded down (e.g., large to small fries), offsetting mix benefits; transactions remained negative (-1.4%) though improved sequentially by 170 bps .
Financial Results
Revenue breakdown (Q2 2025):
KPIs:
Versus S&P Global consensus (Q2 2025):
Values retrieved from S&P Global*.
Guidance Changes
Drivers: Slower class of 2024 ramps in Texas and Stafford opening delays reduced operating weeks; G&A trimmed while maintaining margin targets .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We continue to manage the flow through... delivering restaurant level adjusted EBITDA of $44.5M with a margin of 23.6%... our non comp restaurants in Texas have gotten off to a slower start... We’re testing new ideas, growing our loyalty and tech platforms and reducing build costs” — Michael Osanloo .
- “We remain on track to open 12 restaurants in 2025... projected net cost average of $5.2M to $5.5M per restaurant... 2026 pipeline... multiple 2.0’s and non-traditional formats” — Michael Osanloo .
- “We expect total revenue growth to now be 5% to 7%... G&A $78–$80M... Adjusted EBITDA growth flat to low single digits” — Michelle Hook .
- “Kiosk adoption... frictionless; loyalty near 1.9M members since March; we’ll use Perks surgically to drive acquisition and frequency” — Michael Osanloo .
Q&A Highlights
- Texas ramp and density: Management acknowledged being “a little ahead of demand” in Dallas; rebalanced with sustained marketing and grassroots to build awareness; Arizona/Florida show the model at scale .
- Commodities and hedging: Beef inflation heaviest in Q3–Q4; ~90% beef flats hedged and >70% commodity basket locked to de-risk COGS .
- Unit economics: Build costs down >$1M per unit; inline formats can be sub-$4M capex with attractive ROIs; 2.0 kitchens expected to lower labor/energy needs .
- Drive-thru speed and AI: Cameras/monitors plus AI ordering cut minutes off; plan to conclude test in Q3 and begin deployment in Q4/2026 .
- Loyalty and breakfast: Perks ~1.9M members (rare loyalty per restaurant density); breakfast tests are incremental with no lunch/dinner cannibalization; ongoing evaluation through year-end .
Estimates Context
- Q2 2025: Revenue missed ($188.5M vs $195.8M*), Primary EPS modest beat ($0.134* actual vs $0.115* est.), EBITDA missed ($24.3M* vs $29.4M*). Values retrieved from S&P Global*.
- Implication: Street likely lowers FY25 revenue and EBITDA trajectories given guidance cut and Texas ramp pacing; EPS variance reflects metric definitions (Primary EPS vs diluted) and non-GAAP items . Values retrieved from S&P Global*.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Near-term: Expect continued traffic sensitivity and mix trade-down; watch Q3 beef inflation and Texas comp trajectory; revenue/EBITDA estimate resets likely post guide cut .
- Execution levers: Loyalty scale, kiosk adoption, and AI drive-thru are tangible transaction catalysts into 2026; monitor deployment pace and measured impact on speed/frequency .
- Unit economics: Build-cost discipline and new formats (inline, airport, 2.0 kitchens) support strong cash-on-cash returns despite margin optics; 2026 pipeline diversity is a tailwind .
- Region development: Arizona/Florida performing well; Texas requires sustained marketing and awareness density; Atlanta opening is a proving ground for the “new market playbook” .
- Margin outlook: Restaurant-level margin guide (22.5%–23%) reaffirmed, but other operating expenses and beef costs keep pressure in H2; hedging and pricing discipline mitigate risks .
- Capital and liquidity: Revolver usage to fund growth with goal of no net new borrowings into 2026; monitor cash from operations and capex cadence vs opening timing .
- Stock catalysts: Evidence of sequential transactions improvement, AI/kiosk ROI data points, Atlanta opening performance, and 2.0 build-cost proof points; sustained Texas comp recovery would be a key sentiment inflection .
Note: All quantitative figures from company documents include citations. S&P Global consensus/actual values are marked with * and sourced from S&P Global.